[CVE-2020-11110] What really happened in Grafana code?

-


About the CVE there is an Exploit written by @serWazito0, and Ahmed Sherif who found the finding.

So there is an Exploit so what we will do in this blog?? No, I like coding and code review so I downloaded the vulnerable version from here and start searching for the vulnerable parts of the code.

The exploit sending a payload to an endpoint called [/api/snapshots] after some search in the project files I found file [ShareSnapshotCtrl.ts] in this path [grafana-6.2.5\public\app\features\dashboard\components\ShareModal] and btw it is written in TypeScript. After reading the [ShareSnapshotCtrl] file you can notice that it control the JSON Body of the POST request which vulnerable, our scope is [originalUrl] parameter


Now we know where is the parameter, what is next? the endpoint is creating a Key and to execute the vulnerability we open the link from the response which send get request to this endpoint [dashboard/snapshot/KEY] after taking a look at the routes it takes this syntax


when is a method $routeProvider which used to configure routes, templateUrl used to link the template file which will be used with this route, the controller accepts the function which called when this route is called.

when we send the request to the endpoint with the XSS payload it will create a snapshot Key and will call the endpoint to display the snapshot information using the key, the display endpoint will call the template and will pass the parameters and one of these parameters have our XSS payload.

Maybe this blog is not very useful but I wanna share what I did and maybe I will share something useful in the future.

Follow me on

Twitter: @flex0geek

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Exploit & Debug Looney Tunables CVE-2023-4911 Local Privilege Escalation in the glibc's ld.so

-
Image
Hoi, let's try to debug and explain CVE-2023-4911 which is a buffer overflow in the glibc loader my debugging and exploit tested on Ubuntu 22.04.2 (Jammy Jellyfish), you can read the analysis and more information from the Qualys Security writeup . POC to check if you are vulnerable or not env -i "GLIBC_TUNABLES=glibc.malloc.mxfast=glibc.malloc.mxfast=A" "Z=`printf '%08192x' 1`" /usr/bin/su --help My exploit POC video takes 5m but I speeded up the video Preparing let's disable ASLR and debug our exploit echo 0 | sudo tee /proc/sys/kernel/randomize_va_space you have to know (from qualys security): On Linux, the stack is randomized in a 16GB region, and our environment strings can occupy up to 6MB (_STK_LIM / 4 * 3, in the kernel's bprm_stack_limits()): after 16GB / 6MB = 2730 tries we have a good chance of guessing the address of our environment strings. using the buffer overflow vulnerability in the tunables we will overflow the link_map struct wh
Read more

Lets Analysis STM32F103 Chip Firmware from Attify

-
Image
( بِسْمِ اللَّـهِ الرَّحْمَـٰنِ الرَّحِيمِ ) Let's start our blog. As we know any IoT device should have a firmware to run it and there is a thought that it is secure by default because it is in a board, but we know that we can dump this firmware, our firmware know is already shared with us something like training to learn basics of reversing firmware. you can download the firmware from here . if we run the file command on the firmware we will find this "STM32F103C-firmware.bin: data" and if we try to get the architecture using binwalk it will return empty result "binwalk -A STM32F103C-firmware.bin" but we don't need this because it is a famous chip and we can know what we want from google. After searching for the chip name STM32F103C we will open its default page you will know that it run using "ARM Cortex M3" we will need that later, it is time to analysis using Ghidra. Analysis Dropping the firmware file to Ghidra but it will not detect anything
Read more

Using CSRF I Got Weird Account Takeover

-
Image
Hi guys, I'm back again this bug was interesting and weird let's start. let's refer to the target's name as (target.com) I start to test the domain like what I do in my testing, I used sublist3r to enumerate the subdomains, in one of these subdomains I start to test the password reset function I sent a request to my email to change the password, i opened the link and sent the request to change the password but i used my Burp to see the request and it looks like that there is a token for CSRF I tested this token and deleted it but the change happens, that means there is no filtring for this token there is a CSRF bug here and there is another thing the token of reset password not in the request not in the cookies or in the body so i think it's in the sessions and how i knew that? I test the function of reset password I sent another link to my account and i sent the same request but it returns 403, I opened the new reset link bug didn't use it and I go b
Read more